What Our Customers Say
“”Security Journey was collaborative with the team at Zoom to help understand our needs and how they could help us reach our goals.
, Secure Software Development Lead at Zoom
“”As an engineer, I love the hands-on problems! I think it's a really great challenge and also does a great job of making sure folks are paying attention. I'd highly recommend this.
, Information Technology
“”I like to take up the HACKEDU training to brush-up my skills and the most liked part is the hint and explanation.
, IT Service Management Company
“”Security Journey works in that you have to actually solve problems and code. I think that in terms of measuring the effectiveness, Security Journey is a fantastic product.
, Secure Software Development Leader at Zoom
“”It's nice to be able to consume smaller segments of training without requiring me to block large time blocks.
, Health and Wellness Company
“”When I was searching for a replacement to the Secure Code Warrior training, it was important that I find a provider who appreciated my business no matter how many developers I had. Security Journey welcomed my business, and even helped me create custom learning paths specific to my needs.
, CTO of Optimal Workshop
The Security Journey Difference
Our platform is unlike any in the industry today.
With Security Journey's Secure Code Training Platform, you provide your organization with an entire suite of secure coding training solutions.
From hands-on training for developers to foundational knowledge lessons for all roles in the development process, we take a measurable and integrated approach to building your organization’s security culture.
Security Journey Case Study
Software Technology Company Meets PCI Secure Coding Training Compliance
The software technology company decided to put all their software developers through hands-on secure coding training.
After going through all the lessons, the developers:
- Improved their ability to write secure software
- Boosted their understanding of how systems are hacked
- Decreased the time to solve those security-related issues
After the training and approximately 9 months after the initial assessment, the developers were given another assessment. This time the average score was 85%, up from just 19%, and the developers found 81% of the vulnerabilities.